Employers
The training file an inspection expects
On a regulated topic, the record decides: who completed what, when, with what result, and against which version of the procedure. Three fields of the base equip this work — Legal, Finance and Cybersecurity — and the export produces the dated statement.
What your file contains, line by line
A training file is judged on completeness and on whether it can be dated. The list below is exhaustive: it describes exactly what the export produces, in the order an inspector reads it. Anything belonging to your own framework is added at scoping.
- The person's identity and attachment: department, site, contracting firm
- The exact title of the pathway completed and the content version number
- The supervised hours actually completed, sequence by sequence
- The completion date and assessment result, with the threshold applied
- The expiry date where the topic carries a refresher
- The timestamp of the export itself, which lets a third party date the statement
Content version, the field everyone forgets
A procedure evolves; training completed eighteen months ago covered the previous version. The file that holds is the one linking every completion to ITS content version and triggering a short update when the version changes. This is where a manually rebuilt file proves weakest.
- 01
The procedure changes
You flag the revision, we rework the affected passage: the sequence already exists, only the changed part is reproduced.
- 02
The new version is approved
Two signatures before publication: yours on substance, ours on instructional design.
- 03
The update is pushed
A short module goes to everyone already trained on the previous version, with its own deadline.
- 04
The file reflects both versions
The export distinguishes completions by version and date. An inspection sees a history, not a snapshot.
The titles that professionalise the compliance function
Training the function itself changes the quality of every file it produces. These three titles cover the full chain, from first-line control to expertise. Each carries a published supervised-hours volume, which makes them comparable with any other offer.
| Professional title | Target role | Level | Supervised hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance and Control Officer | compliance officer, control officer | Senior technician and supervisor | 700 h |
| Compliance Manager | compliance officer | Manager and professional | 750 h |
| Compliance and Anti-Money-Laundering Expert | compliance director — banking, microfinance, insurance | Expert and executive | 700 h |
The programmes that equip compliance
Three possible entry points depending on the target function: the legal framework of business, financial control, and command of the systems that produce the record. Each displays its duration, supervised volume and amount before any exchange.
| Programme | What is awarded | Duration | Supervised hours | Fees |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business Law and OHADA Compliance | Bachelor's degree | 3 years | 1800 h | 5 200 000 GNF per year |
| Certificate in OHADA Finance and Compliance | Professional certificate | 6 months | 180 h | 4 200 000 GNF in total |
| Digital Transformation Certificate | Professional certificate | 6 months | 180 h | 3 600 000 GNF in total |
Questions from compliance functions
What exactly does our training file demonstrate?
It demonstrates that an identified population completed identified content, on an identified date, and passed it at an identified threshold. That is the element your compliance function files; the overall judgement belongs to them and to your supervisor, against your actual framework. Our part is the part that is proven on record.
How do you handle refresher deadlines?
Each topic carries its validity period where it has one. The alert goes out before the deadline, not after: the person and their manager are notified, then chased. The dashboard separates what is coming due from what has passed, because the required answer differs.
Is the export readable without access to your tool?
Yes, that is its purpose. The dated statement reads as an ordinary document, with no account and no installation, and is passed on as is to an external auditor. An export requiring access to the supplier's platform fails on the day it matters.
Do you cite the applicable legislation in the content?
Content describes obligations by their NATURE — what must be provable, kept and produced — and relies on your actual framework for precise references. Your compliance function holds the legislation applicable to your business; the content is anchored to it at scoping, which makes it correct for you rather than correct in general.
Explore next
- Site HSETraining the HSE line of an industrial site: 140 modules available, four professional titles from officer to risk manager, recorded induction and a defensible register.
- Team cybersecurityCybersecurity awareness and training for a whole company: digital hygiene, payment fraud, incident response, short sequences repeated through the year.
- Digital transformationSupporting digital transformation through skills: a common base, training on your real workflows, managers on board, usage measured at three months.
- Managers and executivesTraining managers and executives: four management moves, manager and executive pathways, follow-up indicators at three months.
- Upskilling a departmentUpskilling a whole department: reading by level of responsibility, parallel pathways, a full worked example on a support function and a shared calendar.
- Skills-based hiringSkills-based hiring: writing an ad on verifiable blocks, assessing through practical exercises, verifying a certificate online and training on the remaining gap.